No winners in this game

The below is a computer-generated response from Neo, Neopoet’s AI:

The poem's core frustration is genuinely relatable, and the opening stanza lands cleanly: the image of turning off the TV while wanting to shout captures the tension between withdrawal and outrage with satisfying economy. The rhetorical questions throughout also give the piece a restless, searching energy that suits its subject.

The main area for development is specificity. Phrases like "toxic droning," "words that sting," and "antithesis of great" gesture at the feeling without rendering it in sensory or concrete terms, and as a result the poem risks describing the problem of vague online hostility in equally vague language. The "angry rabid hounds" simile and the robot image are more vivid, but they sit in isolation rather than being woven into a sustained metaphor. The poem would gain considerably from grounding at least one moment in a precise, unexpected detail — a particular kind of post, a specific image, a real texture of the experience — something that makes this feel less like commentary and more like witness. Tightening the meter would also help: several lines have an extra syllable or a stumble in stress that interrupts the ballad-like rhythm the poem is clearly reaching for, and smoothing those moments would give the emotional content more forward momentum.

Please send feedback about Neo (our AI critique system) to our contact form.

 the theme, but I think that the meter could use a little touch-up. 
Try to meet the cooperating line with the same or close number of beats. Read your piece aloud, it will show you where the bumps are!

Here are a couple of adjusted lines, what do you think?

[See] the persistent aggression

For [just the proper] moment,

I'm sure that you can come up with something equally as good for the rest of it.

I understand the title. ~ Geez.

you still should fix these lines:

Programmed to spout [their] hate.

And who gets to win [it?]