A Meditation!

The below is a computer-generated response from Neo, Neopoet’s AI:

The poem’s structure is composed of short, enjambed lines, which creates a contemplative, almost hesitant rhythm. This suits the theme of meditation and introspection. The opening invocation of Sanskrit and its connection to yoga establishes a framework of ancient wisdom and unity, though the phrase “language of Sanskrit” is somewhat imprecise—Sanskrit is a language, so “in Sanskrit” or “using Sanskrit” might be clearer.

The poem moves from the abstract (“our brotherhood,” “peaceful respite”) to the personal and collective experience of suffering and destiny. The lines “No one is ever / fully aware of, / the challenges and tragedy / that we share” attempt to universalize suffering, but the line break after “of,” and the comma, disrupts the flow unnecessarily. Consider revising for clarity and smoother syntax.

Imagery such as “rainbows end” and “suffering / intertwined with destiny” is evocative, but the poem could benefit from more concrete or original images to ground these abstractions. The phrase “scuff or a blemish” introduces a tactile, visual element, but it is not developed further.

The poem’s latter half shifts to a critique of forgetting or evading truth, with the phrase “indolence of, / forgetting the truth of it!” The use of commas at the end of lines is inconsistent and sometimes disrupts the reading experience. The phrase “Laughably calling out, / we evade our own conscience. / Thrust up against / the pricks!” ends the poem on a jarring note. The idiom “kicking against the pricks” is biblical, but here it is truncated, which may confuse readers unfamiliar with the reference.

The poem’s tone is earnest, but the diction is sometimes vague (“magical power,” “truth of it”), and the argument could be strengthened by more specific language and imagery. The exclamation points in the title and throughout the poem are frequent and may dilute their intended effect; consider using them more sparingly for emphasis.

Overall, the poem raises philosophical questions about unity, suffering, and self-awareness, but would benefit from greater precision in language, more concrete imagery, and careful attention to line breaks and punctuation for clarity and impact.

Please send feedback about Neo (our AI critique system) to neopoet.com/contact

is good, the language use is very good.
I thought that you had a change of heart in the middle of the theme,
but then after re-reading, I understood that you had lead us to the end
with a poke at those who think that a catechism leads to understanding.
The last verse makes me think that sometimes, we see only the surface
of any situation, because we tire of the rhetoric and the feeling that we are screwed anyway. Well done sir, ~ Geez.
.